What could be noted as a shortcoming of NOMA?

The assertion that science cannot address religious questions is a notable shortcoming of NOMA, which stands for Non-Overlapping Magisteria. This perspective, proposed by Stephen Jay Gould, suggests that science and religion occupy different realms of human experience and authority. While this division can contribute to a peaceful coexistence between the two domains, it also implies that science is not permitted to engage with or inform religious beliefs, which many argue limits the comprehensive understanding of reality.

Such a limitation can be problematic, as it may prevent scientific advancements from addressing moral and existential questions that are often explored through religious frameworks. This inflexibility can also restrict dialogue and mutual enrichment between the two areas, which some advocates of more integrated approaches such as constructive dialogue believe are necessary for a holistic understanding of human experience.